Five Nuggets from the SEC about ASC 606 Transition
five-nuggets-from-the-sec-about-asc-606-transition

Five Nuggets from the SEC about ASC 606 Transition

With an effective date for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 for public entities and December 15, 2018 for all others, companies are focused on the implementation of and transition to ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. If you’ve been following our blogs on the new revenue recognition standard, then you know that this new guidance will likely have some form of impact on all companies and in many cases a significant one! What does the SEC have to say about transition to ASC 606? Do they have any insight, particularly related to compliance with their reporting requirements? Well, they have provided some recent comments. In this blog we will focus on five of those insights, or “nuggets”, shared by the SEC at the AICPA Conference held in December 2016.

Nugget #1 – Transition Disclosures

If you are an SEC filer, you know that SAB Topic 11M indicates that “registrants should discuss the potential effects of adoption of recently issued accounting standards in registration statements and reports filed with the Commission.” Generally, these disclosures should include:

  • A brief description of the new standard, the effective date, and the date the registrant plans to adopt.
  • A discussion of the methods of adoption that are allowed by the standard and which one will be used.
  • A discussion of the impact adoption will have on the financial statements, unless this is not known or reasonably estimable. In that case, a statement to that effect must be made.
  • Disclosure of the potential impact of other significant matters resulting from adoption, for example, violation of debt covenants or changes in business practices.

You are probably thinking, “That’s old news, where is the nugget of new information?” Well, recently members of the SEC’s Office of the Chief Accountant (OCA) Staff have stated, that in addition to the basic requirements, they expect transition disclosures to incorporate:

  • The effect of the accounting policy, if determined
  • Comparison to current accounting policies
  • A status of progress on implementation
  • Discussion of any significant implementation issues that have not yet been addressed

Basically, the OCA Staff is asking for more detail and insight into the impact of the new standard and the implementation process by suggesting that companies take a deeper dive from the basic requirements.

The OCA Staff has reiterated the importance of transition disclosures to investors, even if the impact or full impact is unknown. In that case, more qualitative disclosures should be provided. The OCA Staff also believes that transition disclosures should evolve and become more robust over time.

Nugget #2 – Selected Financial Data

ASC 606 provides for a full retrospective approach, a retrospective approach with practical expedients, or a modified retrospective approach to transition. The full retrospective approach requires recasting all periods presented in the financial statements. Therefore, while it is clear that the three most recent years presented in the selected financial data table would also be recast consistent with the financial statements, what about two earliest years? Does a company have to go back and recast those too? The SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance (DCF) Staff has indicated that it will provide transition relief so that filers will not have to recast those two earliest years.

While this blog is about transition to the new revenue standard, it is interesting to note that the DCF Staff has said that SEC filers would not be required to recast years four and five in the selected financial data table to reflect the new leasing standard, since that transition method is a modified retrospective approach and not a full retrospective approach. While not specifically mentioned by the SEC, we would think that this logic would also apply if the modified retrospective method is chosen for transition to the new revenue recognition standard, basically meaning that explicit direction or relief from the SEC is not necessary.

Nugget #3 – Registration Statements

This one is easier to explain with an example. Let’s say we have a calendar year end company that adopts the new revenue recognition standard on January 1, 2018 using the full retrospective method. Let’s also say they file a new or amended registration statement after they file their first report (1 st quarter Form 10-Q) that reflects the adoption of the new standard. This registration statement must include, or incorporate by reference, the audited three-year financial statements for the period ended December 31, 2017. Since the full retrospective method of adoption was used, these financial statements must also be recast to reflect the change to the new standard, including the 2015 period. The 2015 period is one that would not otherwise have been recast to reflect the new standard. This is something to be aware of if a registration statement is in the works since recasting an additional year will require more time and effort.

What about the fact that ASC 606 references ASC 250 for transition guidance which includes an impracticability exception when using a full retrospective method to transition to a new accounting standard? Could that exception possibly apply here? The SEC’s DCF staff says not likely. Well, those aren’t their actual words; they actually said they believe meeting that impracticability exception is a “high hurdle” (and I think we know what that means!).

Nugget #4 – Shelf Takedowns

Now for some good news on the registration front. Sometimes a post-effective amendment must be made to a shelf registration, such as a Form S-3, before capital is raised through a shelf takedown. The SEC says that an amendment is required when there has been a “fundamental change” to the disclosure. While judgment is required in determining whether a fundamental change has occurred, the SEC’s DCF Staff has indicated that they would find it unlikely that the adoption of a new standard would qualify as a fundamental change, which is generally defined at a higher threshold than “material”. Therefore, it sounds like no amendment will be required before the takedown as a result of adopting a new standard.

Nugget #5 – Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting (ICFR)

Last but certainly not least, let’s talk about ICFR. The SEC has reminded companies that changes to their ICFR will be a key part of proper implementation of the new revenue recognition standard from both an accounting and a disclosure perspective. This means that even companies with little overall accounting impact can still expect impacts on their ICFR, particularly from a disclosure standpoint. Remember that there is also a requirement to disclose changes in ICFR that have a material impact overall on ICFR.

This probably won’t be the last we hear from the SEC as transition to ASC 606 continues. We’ll keep you posted, and we’ll also look forward to the next stops on the transition railroad… leases and financial instruments.

Disclaimer
This post is published to spread the love of GAAP and provided for informational purposes only. Although we are CPAs and have made every effort to ensure the factual accuracy of the post as of the date it was published, we are not responsible for your ultimate compliance with accounting or auditing standards and you agree not to hold us responsible for such. In addition, we take no responsibility for updating old posts, but may do so from time to time.

New Revenue Standard
 
New Revenue Standard

Comments (0)


Add a Comment




Allowed tags: <b><i><br>Add a new comment:


Ready To Make a Change?

Cookies on the GAAP Dynamics website

To give you the best possible experience, this website uses cookies. By continuing to browse this website you are agreeing to our use of cookies. For more details about cookies and how to manage them, please see our privacy policy.