Loan participations and loan syndications are terms often interchanged to describe a lending arrangement involving more than one lender; however, for accounting and reporting purposes, these are two different types of transactions with unique considerations and issues. We often get questions from participants in our classroom Banking Industry Fundamentals training programs and have dedicated time to this subject in our eLearning series available on the Revolution, our online learning platform.
While both loan participations and syndications involve multiple lenders, the way each is structured results in different accounting issues, including derecognition under ASC 860 and recognition of fees under ASC 606 and/or ASC 310.
In a loan participation, a bank will originate a loan to a borrower. This is the only loan the borrower enters into. Subsequently, or concurrently, with the origination of this loan, the originating bank arranges a participation with other lenders. Under the participation arrangement, the participating banks agree to assume the risks and rewards of a portion of this loan by transferring funds to the originating bank in return for the rights to cash payments for that portion of the loan participated out to the participating bank.
In a loan participation, the originating bank enters into several lending arrangements. The first transaction is the loan origination to the borrower. This transaction will follow the normal accounting for loans under ASC 310. The unloading of a portion of the loan to participating banks represents a “transfer of a financial asset” (i.e. the loan, or a portion of the loan) and must be assessed for derecognition under ASC 860. This analysis involves determining if the participating loan represents a “participating interest” under ASC 860 and further whether control over the participating loan has been relinquished by the originating bank.
In a loan syndication, the bank with the “relationship” with the borrower likely does not want to assume the risk of issuing such a large loan. As a result, rather than underwrite the entire loan and look to participate it out to other banks, the lead bank acts as a “syndicate”, matching the borrower up with multiple lenders, each of which underwrites and originates its own loan to the borrower. As a result, there are multiple loans issued by numerous banks to the one borrower.
Loan syndications do not involve any “transfers of financial assets” as each loan in a syndication is between a respective originating bank and the borrower. As a result, ASC 860 and the analysis of derecognition is not an issue. However, there are some issues for the lead syndicate bank involving revenue recognition related to the fees it collects from the borrower. Some of these fees may represent “syndication fees” for arranging the deal, as well as typical lenders fees for the loan it has underwritten itself. Also, these arrangements may involve the lead syndicate servicing the series of loans on behalf of the syndicate banks. For these loans, other than its own originated loan, the lead syndicate will need to recognize a servicing asset (or liability) in accordance with ASC 860.
How do you tell the difference?
As it is illustrated above, these two arrangements (a loan participation and syndication) have unique terms even though they achieve the same economic result. Therefore, the only way to know whether you are dealing with a participation or syndication is the READ the loan agreements! Careful consideration should be given to the legal underwriters and parties to the contract, contractual terms of the instruments, and other conditions to make a final analysis.
Often it is a legal determination that will dictate whether it is a loan participation or syndication. Once this determination is made, it’s on to the accounting analysis!
About GAAP Dynamics
We’re a DIFFERENT type of accounting training firm. We don’t think of training as a “tick the box” exercise, but rather an opportunity to empower your people to help them make the right decisions at the right time. Whether it’s U.S. GAAP training, IFRS training, or audit training, we’ve helped thousands of professionals since 2001. Our clients include some of the largest accounting firms and companies in the world. As lifelong learners, we believe training is important. As CPAs, we believe great training is vital to doing your job well and maintaining the public trust. We want to help you understand complex accounting matters and we believe you deserve the best training in the world, regardless of whether you work for a large, multinational company or a small, regional accounting firm. We passionately create high-quality training that we would want to take. This means it is accurate, relevant, engaging, visually appealing, and fun. That’s our brand promise. Want to learn more about how GAAP Dynamics can help you? Let’s talk!
This post is published to spread the love of GAAP and provided for informational purposes only. Although we are CPAs and have made every effort to ensure the factual accuracy of the post as of the date it was published, we are not responsible for your ultimate compliance with accounting or auditing standards and you agree not to hold us responsible for such. In addition, we take no responsibility for updating old posts, but may do so from time to time.