It’s October and that means Halloween will be here before we know it! Unfortunately for bankers, there’s a ghoul that haunts them year-round: troubled debt restructurings! But a recent accounting standards update (ASU) may reduce their fright! ASU 2022-02 Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures was issued in response to feedback received by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) during the post-implementation review process associated with ASC 326 Financial Instruments – Credit Losses. This ASU tackled two issues:
- troubled debt restructurings by creditors and
- vintage disclosures of gross write offs
While the ASU eliminated accounting guidance for troubled debt restructurings (TDRs), it also enhanced disclosure requirements. This post will discuss the changes as a result of the ASU and you can decide for yourself if this ASU was a treat or if it makes things trickier for you!
TDRs: A source of toil and trouble
The current guidance notes a modification is a troubled debt restructuring (TDR) if both of two conditions are met: (1) the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and (2) a concession is granted by the creditor (that would not be granted to a borrower of similar credit risk and situation - e.g., not a market interest rate). The current accounting treatment for TDRs is to carry forward any unamortized net deferred fees/costs into the amortized cost basis of the modified receivable. Entities are required to estimate and record lifetime expected credit losses for TDRs in scope of ASC 326 Financial Instruments – Credit Losses. The guidance specifically notes that when the discounted cash flow (DCF) model is used for estimating expected credit losses on TDRs, that the original contractual interest rate (e.g., the “old” rate) is to be used in the DCF calculation to measure expected credit losses.
This guidance was noted as unnecessarily complex by both preparers and users of the financial statements. As a result, the FASB performed research and cast a spell (ASU 2022-02) to transform the guidance!
Main provisions of ASU 2022-02
ASU 2022-02 has two main components:
- Eliminated troubled debt restructuring (TDR) recognition and measurement guidance
- Required disclosure of gross write-offs by vintage for public business entities (PBEs) only
Let’s talk about the first one, which I think most of you will consider to be a treat!
Elimination of TDR recognition and measurement guidance
ASU 2022-02 explains that when a loan is modified, a creditor is now to utilize the guidance found in ASC 310-20-35-9 through 35-11 to determine if the modification results in a new loan or if it is a continuation of an existing loan. Sound familiar? It should! This is the guidance commonly referred to as the 10% test or “more than minor” modification.
A creditor (i.e., a bank) must answer the following questions to determine the accounting treatment:
- Is the modified loan’s terms at least as favorable to the bank as those that would be given to the bank’s other customers with similar credit risk? (e.g., a market interest rate would qualify as a “yes”). If yes, move to #2. If no, account for the modification as a continuation of an existing loan.
- Is the present value of the cash flows under the new terms at least 10% different from the present value of the remaining cash flows under the original terms (“old” terms)? If yes, account for as a new loan. If no, move to #3.
- Is the modification “more than minor” based on the specific facts and circumstances surrounding the modification? If yes, account for the modification as a new loan. If no, account for the modification as a continuation of an existing loan.
So why does it matter if a loan is determined to be a modification of an existing loan or a new receivable? This determination drives the accounting treatment and fee recognition!
If a modification is determined to be a new receivable, then any unamortized net fees/costs and prepayment penalties are immediately recognized in interest income when the new receivable is granted. However, if the modification is deemed to be a modification of an existing receivable (“continuation”) then these fees/costs are carried forward as part of the modified receivable and any new fees/costs associated with the modification are added to the amortized cost basis of the receivable.
Additionally, if the DCF model is chosen to be utilized by the creditor when estimating cash flows, the effective interest rate used in the calculation is required to be the modified effective interest rate (e.g., use the “new” rate).
This all feels like quite the treat, but unfortunately TDRs haven’t been sent to the graveyard completely…
The ASU requires enhanced disclosures to be made for modified receivables for debtors experiencing financial difficulty. These include the requirement to disclose each reporting period, by class of financing receivable:
- Types of modifications
- Financial effect of modification by type of modification
- Receivable performance in the 12 months following a modification
Additionally, qualitative information about how credit losses are estimated for the modifications is required to be disclosed each reporting period, by portfolio segment.
Disclosure of gross write-offs by vintage
The second component of ASU 2022-02 impacts public business entities (PBEs) only.
The FASB received feedback that gross write-offs by year of origination (or vintage) was useful information for financial statement users. ASU 2022-02 was revised to note the requirement (for PBEs only) to disclose gross write-offs by vintage. Based on what we’ve seen, many banks were already disclosing this information, so hopefully this doesn’t cause you too much horror!
Lastly, there were inconsistencies noted in the illustrative disclosures previously included in ASC 326. The illustrated example found within the standard contained a line item disclosing current period recoveries by vintage; however, this was not specifically required by the guidance to be disclosed. Example 15 (ASC 326-20-55-79) was updated to reflect this change as part of ASU 2022-02.
Effective date and transition
For entities that have adopted ASC 326, the amendments in ASU 2022-02 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years.
For entities that have not yet adopted ASC 326, the effective dates for the amendments in ASU 2022-02 are the same as the effective dates in ASC 326.
The amendments in ASU 2022-02 should be applied prospectively for modifications and write-offs after the first day of the fiscal year of adoption. Entities have the option to apply a modified retrospective approach by making a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings to recognize any changes in credit losses due to the change in TDR recognition and measurement guidance.
Recent accounting spells and a bank-specific spell book
Our U.S. GAAP and IFRS updates are the magic potion you need to understand recent updates to the accounting guidance! Our U.S. GAAP Update covers all of the major ASUs effective for both public and private companies in 2022, 2023, and beyond! The IFRS Update covers recent activity by the IASB, IFRS Interpretations Committee (IFRIC), and recent European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) enforcement actions.
Does the accounting guidance for banks send a chill up your spine? Consider our Banking Industry Fundamentals collection of eLearning courses. This collection provides you with an in-depth understanding of the industry-specific topics applicable to banks.
As always, we’re here to help – reach out and Let’s talk!
About GAAP Dynamics
We’re a DIFFERENT type of accounting training firm. We don’t think of training as a “tick the box” exercise, but rather an opportunity to empower your people to help them make the right decisions at the right time. Whether it’s U.S. GAAP training, IFRS training, or audit training, we’ve helped thousands of professionals since 2001. Our clients include some of the largest accounting firms and companies in the world. As lifelong learners, we believe training is important. As CPAs, we believe great training is vital to doing your job well and maintaining the public trust. We want to help you understand complex accounting matters and we believe you deserve the best training in the world, regardless of whether you work for a large, multinational company or a small, regional accounting firm. We passionately create high-quality training that we would want to take. This means it is accurate, relevant, engaging, visually appealing, and fun. That’s our brand promise. Want to learn more about how GAAP Dynamics can help you? Let’s talk!
This post is published to spread the love of GAAP and provided for informational purposes only. Although we are CPAs and have made every effort to ensure the factual accuracy of the post as of the date it was published, we are not responsible for your ultimate compliance with accounting or auditing standards and you agree not to hold us responsible for such. In addition, we take no responsibility for updating old posts, but may do so from time to time.
Add a Comment