Intangible Assets (ASC 350) and Business Combinations (ASC 805)
M&A activity has spiked as of late and is expected to continue. As a result, it makes sense for accountants to brush up on the proper accounting for business combinations under ASC 805. This post explores a common issue when accounting for a business combination: properly identifying and valuing intangible assets acquired in accordance with ASC 805 and ASC 350. For more general information on business combinations and common issues, check our our Business Combinations topic page.
The basics: Intangible assets and business combinations
Assuming the transaction qualifies as a business combination, the acquirer is required to identify ALL the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, regardless of whether or not they were previously recorded by the entity being acquired. With respect to the assets acquired, this includes not only tangible assets such as inventory and property, plant, and equipment, but also intangible assets.
ASC 350 requires intangible assets to be separately recognized apart from goodwill if they are (a) separable or (b) arise from contractual or legal rights. For more on the accounting for intangible assets, check out this course. The list of intangible assets that could be recognized is quite long, and includes assets such as:
- Trademarks and trade names
- Non-competition agreements
- Order or production backlog
- Customer contracts and related customer relationships
- Customer lists
- Lease agreements
- Brands
- Licensing, royalty, and standstill agreements
- Use rights (e.g. drilling, water, timber, etc.)
- Patented technology
- Trade secrets (e.g. formulas, recipes, processes, etc.)
And that’s just the tip of the iceberg!
Identifying a complete list of intangible assets is not an easy task, especially given the fact that most are not recognized on the acquiree’s balance sheet. Make sure your company (or your client) is performing a thorough analysis to identify all of the acquired intangible assets.
A private company alternative
But wait just a second…maybe your company or client does not have to record all of the intangible assets acquired! Is your company or client a private company? If so, the Private Company Council (PCC) has guidance that provides an election to certain private companies. This guidance allows private companies to apply an accounting alternative with respect to recognizing or otherwise considering the fair value of intangible assets as a result of any transactions within scope.
The theory behind this guidance was that identifying and valuing certain intangible assets burdens private companies with undue costs and time – and the benefits weren’t outweighing those costs. This accounting alternative provides the option to no longer recognize separately from goodwill:
- Customer-related intangible assets unless they are capable of being sold or licensed independently from the other assets of the business, and
- Non-competition agreements
So, what are some examples of customer related intangible assets that may meet that criteria? Examples could include mortgage servicing rights, commodity supply contracts, core deposits, and customer information.
The catch? Any private company wishing to cash-in on this simplified accounting must also elect to apply the PCC guidance allowing private companies to amortize goodwill.
Valuation of intangible assets acquired
And to add to the complexity, let’s think about how we measure intangible assets at fair value. How do you do it? Typically, you’ll see three common income approach valuation methods used:
- Relief-from-Royalty: This method determines the fair value of an intangible asset by reference to the capitalized value of the hypothetical royalty payments that would be saved through owning the asset, as compared with licensing the asset from a third party.
- With-and-Without Method: Also known as the incremental cash flow method, this method measures the benefits (e.g., cash flows) derived from ownership of an intangible asset as if it were in place, as compared to the expected cash flows if the intangible asset were not in place. The residual or net cash flows of the two models are ascribable to the intangible asset and, when discounted to its present value, provide an estimate of fair value.
- Multi-Period Excess Earnings Method (MPEEM): This method involves forecasting the cash flows that a market participant would expect to derive from the business or businesses that use the subject intangible asset. From this forecast of cash flows, the entity deducts the contribution to the cash flows made by contributory assets, tangible and intangible, other than the subject intangible asset. The remaining cash flows are attributable to the subject intangible asset and, once discounted to its present value, provide an estimate of fair value.
As you can see, the valuation of intangible assets acquired in a business combination typically involves sophisticated models using unobservable inputs (i.e., Level 3 fair value measurements). This is why management typically engages specialists to value these assets. Remember that although they are using a specialist, this does not relieve them of their overall responsibility for properly accounting for the business combination.
Final thoughts
When a company determines that they have a business combination that needs to be accounted for under ASC 805 using the acquisition method, the company should recognize all intangible assets acquired (even those that were not recorded on the acquiree’s balance sheet) at fair value at the acquisition date. The only exception to this rule is for private companies opting to follow the PCC’s guidance, which excludes certain customer related intangibles and non-compete agreements.
Valuation of intangible assets acquired at fair value also involves judgement, as many of the models used to determine the fair value are income approach-based models that rely heavily on third party or unobservable inputs. Remember, if your company or your client chooses to engage a third party specialist to assist in the valuation, company management is still responsible for that estimation. Management needs to have a sound understanding of the key inputs and assumptions used in the model and be able to defend why that valuation approach was appropriate.
About GAAP Dynamics
We’re a DIFFERENT type of accounting training firm. We view training as an opportunity to empower professionals to make informed decisions at the right time. Whether it’s U.S. GAAP, IFRS, or audit training, we’ve trained thousands of professionals since 2001, including at some of the world’s largest firms. Our promise: Accurate, relevant, engaging, and fun training. Want to know how GAAP Dynamics can help you? Let’s talk!
Disclaimer
This post is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as official accounting guidance. While we’ve ensured accuracy as of the publishing date, standards evolve. Please consult a professional for specific advice.
